Lemons or Lemonade?

Guest Blog by Kip Robbins, CFA, Zacks.com.

This past Sunday it was 71 degrees and dry in Chicago.  If you’ve ever lived here in November, you know that’s an anomaly.  At this time of year, it’s usually 44 and wet.  I felt so warm, I decided to have a glass of lemonade which is usually reserved mostly as a summer treat.  As I sat on my porch enjoying the day with my beverage, it reminded me of the tale of two lemonade entrepreneurs.

The story itself is a little long, but here’s the summary.

There are two businessmen (Bill & Ted) that decide to setup lemonade stands.  Bill does everything with a just-in-time approach: buying only the amount of supplies and inventory he needs for each day.  Ted decides to buy everything for 100 days of lemonade sales up front, including a brand new stand. Total Day 1 costs for Bill are $120 and for Ted they are $2100.  Since the quality of product and price are the same, they both earn $200 the first day.

It’s pretty clear Ted needs an accountant to handle the expensing of his equipment with the accrual method.  The accountant determines that Ted could expense $120 that first day.  So Bill’s and Ted’s net income is the same: $80.  However, interesting enough, Ted has a cash flow of -$1900 the first day while Bill has a +$80 cash flow.  The effect you see here is that Bill has a low or zero level of accruals and Ted has a very high level of accruals.  It could also be also said that even though both had income of $80, that Bill’s income was of a higher quality than Ted’s.

So which person do you think is taking more risk?  What if customers start putting their lemonade purchases on account and then don’t pay?  What if there are some rainy or cold days that dampen sales?  It’s pretty clear Ted might even have some days when he looses money because he still has to expense those assets.

Now let’s move out of our hypothetical lemonade stands and into the reality of the stock market.  The Accrual Anomaly, first discovered by Dr. Richard Sloan, provides evidence that stocks of companies with low accruals significantly outperform stocks of companies with high accruals.  That’s the key: the market rewards cash inflows and higher-quality earnings as opposed to cash outflows and low-quality earnings.

Let’s take a look at those rewards.  In Sloan’s research, he finds creating a hedged portfolio of buying low-accrual companies and shorting high-accrual companies created an average return of 11% per year from 1970-2007.  Using Research Wizard, I continued the study from 2008 through October 2011 and observed an average annualized return of 15%.  Lemonade, indeed!

Here’s a method for finding stocks to take advantage of Accrual Anomaly:

  • First, start with only U.S. common stocks.
  • Next, create a liquid (no pun intended!), investible set of the stocks with the largest 3000 market values and average daily trading volume ≥ to 100,000 shares (if there’s not enough liquidity, it’ll be hard for you to trade it).
  • Add another filter by selecting those stocks with a Zacks Rank ≤ 3.  (Let’s be clever and avoid the poorly-rated stocks.)
  • Select the top 10 stocks with the lowest accruals (net income – cash flows) / total assets

If you’d like to learn more about Accruals, as well as other anomalies, you’re in luck.  The Handbook of Equity Market Anomalies has just been released and it details several winning strategies used by investment pros.  You can also learn more about various market anomalies by visiting a website dedicated to their explanation and discussion: hema.zacks.com.

But for now, focus your investment choices on high cash flow, higher earnings quality and low accrual companies and you’ll be more likely to experience the sweet taste of lemonade.

(Disclosure: Zacks is unaffiliated with FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. but does use its services.)

Related Links:

By Folio Investing The brokerage with a better way. Securities products and services offered through FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s