The S&P500 is up by 26% for the year-to-date, despite the fact that employment growth is anemic, the labor participation rate is at its lowest point in thirty five years, and inflation-adjusted GDP growth is experiencing a long-term slowing (see chart below). GDP turns negative in recessions—this is the definition of a recession—but has historically recovered much faster than we have seen in the post 2008 years. Continue reading
Doug Short has written a great article on median U.S. household income through time. He shows that the median household income in the U.S., adjusted for inflation, has fallen by 7.2% since 2000 and is 7.9% below the peak reached near the start of 2008, as we entered the last recession. How do we reconcile this with the notion of an economic recovery? Continue reading
Availability of timely data is at the core of effective financial and economic analysis. The Federal Reserve Economic Database (FRED) provides a vast array of economic time series via an intuitive graphical interface. If you want to get a read on the U.S. economy, FRED is an outstanding resource. The ability to quickly create customized charts makes it quick and easy to examine a wide range of data. In this article, I am going to show a number of these charts, while exploring the overall economic U.S. economic picture. Continue reading
Stock investors generally don’t have much to fear on Friday the 13th. Historically, Friday the 13th is a relatively calm day for stocks. Jason Zweig, who writes The Wall Street Journal’s Intelligent Investor column, says it’s usually a good day for investors and says superstition about trading on this supposedly unlucky day is one of the market’s “dumbest myths.”
Bond yields, however, are seriously worrying to Geoff Considine. Here’s why. Continue reading
New data shows that housing prices are not improving.
Nationally, prices have now dropped 34.4% from their peak in 2006. Prices are now the lowest they have been since the end of 2002, according to the Case/Shiller index. Robert Shiller, co-creator of the index and long-term researcher on housing prices, warns that risks remain and that we may be seeing a broad shift in consumers’ beliefs with regard to the desirability and risks of owning a house. In fact, Shiller speculates that it may take decades for suburban single-family housing prices to recover.
A chart of the 20-city composite of U.S. house prices tells the story (below):
(Case/Shiller 20-City U.S. Home Price Index, Seasonally Adjusted. Source: Standard and Poors.)
Nationally, home prices more than doubled from 2000-2006. From mid-2006 to mid-2009, prices dropped as dramatically as they rose during the boom. We experienced a slight bounce from mid-2009 to mid-2010, but prices started to decline again in 2010 and are now at their lowest point in a decade.
Implications of Weak Housing Values
Beyond the obvious impacts on homeowners’ net worth, what are the implications of weak housing values for the economy?
First, for many Americans, their houses represent most of their net worth. What’s more, less wealthy households tend to have a higher percentage of their net worth in home equity. A continued decline in house prices tends to increase wealth inequality, as well as reducing household net worth as a whole. Given that fewer and fewer Americans have traditional employer-sponsored pension plans, reductions in household net worth translate directly into fewer financial resources available to fund retirement and other long-term liabilities.
Second, we have the wealth effect. People tend to feel wealthier when the paper value of their assets is higher, and they tend to spend more. This may be an especially powerful driver of consumption when homeowners can easily use home equity loans to fund purchases of consumer goods. A number of studies have found that wealth in the form of home equity is a larger driver of consumer spending than other forms of wealth.
Third, we have the manifestation of de-leveraging among individual investors. People who lose their homes to foreclosure are not likely to purchase new homes. In addition, baby boomers who are saddled with mortgages they cannot really afford are likely to sell their homes to get out from under the risks that such leverage (e.g. mortgaged) creates. Gary Shilling recently outlined this scenario. With a smaller pool of ready buyers, this de-leveraging across the residential real estate market is a deflationary force.
Is There Any Good News?
Yes, some. Buying a house is looking more and more attractive relative to renting. With low interest rates and lower prices, the cost of purchasing a house is lower than it has been over most of the last ten years. Ken Johnson, a professor who studies real estate, and the buy-vs.-rent problem in particular, concludes that buying looks like a better bet than renting. On the other hand, it is hardly surprising that potential home buyers, and especially first-time buyers, will be very wary of borrowing large sums of money to purchase an asset that may be hard to sell (liquidity risk) and that has the potential to drop as much as we have seen housing prices fall in recent years.
On the other hand, the implications of the most recent Case/Shiller numbers are not very positive. The best that can be said is that housing prices have shifted from a dramatic free fall to a slower downward drift. It is hard to tell whether this persistent declined in housing prices is a symptom or a cause of an ongoing economic malaise. For wealthier Americans, the massive upswing in the stock market has offset declines in housing values. For less-well-off Americans, the continued erosion of net worth suggests it will be a very slow recovery in terms of personal wealth and in terms of a sustained recovery in consumer spending, which has historically depended on the “wealth effect.”
- Is Your Home a Good Investment?
- New Tax Deductions and Limits for 2012
- Risk Budgeting: A Critical Tool for Portfolio Management
Folio Investing The brokerage with a better way. Securities products and services offered through FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC.
This has been a chaotic year in the financial world. In this latest article, I will take a look at what happened in 2011 and give my personal views on where things are going for 2012.
Many Happy Returns?
The biggest news of the year would have to be Europe. As I write this, the EAFE index of international developed-market stocks has returned -12% for the trailing 1-year period and an annualized -4.7% per year over the last five years. The EAFE index has a 15-year annualized return of 3.3% per year.
The S&P 500 Index has delivered 2.8% for the trailing 1-year and stands at almost exactly 0% total annualized returns (including dividends) for the trailing three years. On the other hand, Continue reading
The New York Times had a piece this weekend that proposes a simple portfolio solution for worried investors.
Are you ready for this?
The portfolio is a 50% allocation to stocks and 50% to bonds. The conclusion that the 50/50 portfolio makes sense is based on a study by Vanguard published in October 2011 that finds that this allocation seems to generate consistent returns, regardless of whether the economy is in recession or expansion. The study is based on portfolio performance from 1926 through June 2009.
The 50/50 portfolio generated an average annual return of 7.75% per year during recessions and 9.9% per year during expansions. Continue reading
As I write this on November 26, the S&P 500 Index is down by about 4.6% for the week. The S&P 500 dropped 1.9% on November 21st and then dropped 2.2% on November 23rd. These are enormous daily drops.
Something has happened that has convinced the aggregate of market participants that the total value of every company represented in these indexes is suddenly worth about 4.6% less today than they were worth a week ago. What terrible news has led to this reduction in the value of these hundreds of firms?
Nothing concrete, really. Continue reading
Carl Richards’ is a favorite contributor here at the Portfolioist. We’ve interviewed him in the past (see, “How to Pick an Investment Advisor (Part 3): Carl Richards’ 3 Key Questions” by Nanette Byrnes) and remain a fan of his website, behaviorgap.com.
Using a Sharpie and a piece of card stock, Richards captures complex financial ideas in simple, easy-to-understand sketches.
Here’s his latest sketch and commentary on the recent market volatility. Enjoy–we certainly did. Continue reading
“Buy and hold is dead.”
“Diversification is an easy way to lose.”
“Diversification is for idiots.”
What I want to know is: Where’s the evidence? Continue reading